Innovation in Community Protection Against AI-Generated Content: Urgency of Applying Sunset Clause Method with Regulatory Impact Analysis Approach
Keywords:
AI-Generated Content, Artificial Intelligence, Regulatory Impact Analysis, Sunset ClauseAbstract
Dependence on Artificial Intelligence in helping to carry out daily tasks and activities is becoming increasingly significant. Various Artificial Intelligence services ranging from software development to foreign language translators have significantly increased the impact of Artificial Intelligence on society. However, the content produced by Artificial Intelligence can have major negative impacts, including the spread of disinformation through AI-Generated Content that threatens democracy and public trust, violations of privacy resulting from unauthorized use of personal data, discrimination, and prejudice. This study uses a normative legal research method with a legislative approach, a conceptual approach, and a comparative approach. This study shows that the Sunset Clause method in Indonesian law enforcement has great potential to increase the efficiency and relevance of laws and regulations in protecting society from the threat of the development of Artificial Intelligence technology, in line with SDGs point number 16 to ensure sustainable development in realizing the goals of the SDGs. This research provides innovation in the form of implementing the Sunset Clause model, which includes the validity period of a law, as well as a mechanism for reviewing laws and regulations through Regulatory Impact Analysis to protect the public from the threat of AI-Generated Content.
References
Atherton, D. (2023, October 7). Incident 573: Deepfake Recordings Allegedly Influence Slovakian Election. Incidentdatabase.Ai. https://incidentdatabase.ai/cite/573/.
Aumüller, U., & Meyer, E. (2024). Trusting AI: Factors Influencing Willingness of Accountability for AI-Generated Content in the Workplace. Human Factors and Systems Interaction, 154, 77–84. https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1005355.
Baugus, B., & Bose, F. (2018). Sunset Legislation in the States: Balancing the Legislature and the Executive. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3211623.
Damiani, J. (2019, September 3). A Voice Deepfake Was Used To Scam A CEO Out Of $243,000. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jessedamiani/2019/09/03/a-voice-deepfake-was-used-to-scam-a-ceo-out-of-243000/?sh=2aac4e822416.
Ekatjahjana, W., Hauerstein, K., & Heilmann, D. (2019). Regulatory Reform in Indonesia A Legal Perspective.
Gavin, G. (2023, June 5). ‘Fake Putin’ announces Russia under attack as Ukraine goes on offensive. Politico.Eu. https://www.politico.eu/article/fake-vladimir-putin-announces-russia-under-attack-ukraine-war/.
Guadamuz, A. (2021). Do androids dream of electric copyright? Comparative analysis of originality in artificial intelligence generated works. Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property, 147–176. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198870944.003.0008.
Ihsanul Maarif, I., & Arifin, F. (2022). Komparasi Penggunaan Analysis Regulatory Method Sebagai Instrumen Pendukung Kebijakan Dalam Penyusunan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Litigasi, 23(2), 272–290. https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v23i2.6128
Molloy, S., Mousmouti, M., & De Vrieze, F. (2022). Sunset Clauses and Post-Legislative Scrutiny: Bridging the Gap between Potential and Reality. The PLS Series, February, 1–31.
Pan, Z., Wang, S., & Zhang, C. (2024). The Research On The Ownership Of Copyright Of AI-generated Content. 39, 362–368.
Ranchordás, S. (2014). Sunset Clauses and Experimental Legislation: Blessing or Curse for Innovation? https://pure.uvt.nl/portal/files/11966586/Ranchordas_sunset_26_05_2014_emb_tot_01_06_2016.pdf.
Retnosari, A., Rizqi, H., Syaif, A., & Airlangga, U. (2024). Penerapan Regulatory Impact Assessment dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan : Suatu Kewajiban atau Saran?. Cakrawala Journal, 18(1), 143–153.
Sihombing, E. N., & Adi Syaputra, M. Y. (2020). Implementasi Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 14(3), 419. https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2020.v14.419-434.
Suparmiatun, E., Syarifah, N., Perdana, R., Wahanu, H., & Priyono, E. (2011). Pengembangan dan Implementasi Metode Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) untuk Menilai Kebijakan (Peraturan dan Non Peraturan) di Kementerian PPN/BAPPENAS. Biro Hukum Kementerian PPN/BAPPENAS, 1–23.
Tuomi, I. (2018). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Learning, Teaching, and Education Policies. In Science for Policy. https://doi.org/10.2760/12297.
Tysara, L. (2021). Kelemahan Omnibus Law adalah Membatasi Ruang Partisipasi, Begini Penerapan di Indonesia. Liputan6.Com. https://www.liputan6.com/hot/read/4979567/kelemahan-omnibus-law-adalah-membatasi-ruang-partisipasi-begini-penerapan-di-indonesia?page=3.
Wakefield, J. (2022, March 18). Deepfake presidents used in Russia-Ukraine war. Www.Bbc.Com. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-60780142.
Waller, J. K. (2009). The Expenditure Effects of Sunset Laws in State Governments. https://search.proquest.com/docview/304865008%0Ahttps://search.proquest.com/docview/304865008.
Wicaksono, D. A. (2023). Quo Vadis Pengaturan Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 20(2), 44–60. https://e-jurnal.peraturan.go.id/index.php/jli/article/view/44.
Yasin, M. (2020). Plus Minus Metode Omnibus Law. Hukumonline.Com. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/plus-minus-metode-iomnibus-law-i-lt5f8bd2cf64081?page=3.
Youvan, D. C. (2024). The Corporate Control of Free Speech: Ethical Constraints and the Terseness of AI-Generated Content. July. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15458.75209.
